Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Banks v. Stokes et al.
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff: Charles E. Banks, III, Chuck Banks and Chuckie Banks
Defendant: Michael T. Stokes, C. Holycross, D. Deangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Kelley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant: Ben Burnett, Jimmy Gray, Union City Police Department, Union City, TN and others
Plaintiff: Cornilios Woody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELTY v. KULT, et al
as 2:2020cv00810
Defendant: KULT, CHUCKY, UNIT MANAGER MISS TINA M. RENNER and others
Plaintiff: JOSEPH WELTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOOD v. USA
as 1:2020cv00475
Petitioner: CHUCKIE DALE WOOD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WOOD v. USA
as 1:2019cv01190
Petitioner: CHUCKIE DALE WOOD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nagel v. Hilton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant: Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff: Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Warren et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant: Charles Tynon, Linda Ford, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff: Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv02818
Petitioner: Chucky Ransom
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Beaver v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00791
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Chuckie Beaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Olmstead v. Fentress County, TN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff: Phillip David Olmstead
Defendant: Fentress County, TN, Tony (l/n/u), Chucky Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?