Cases 1 - 10 of 22
(PC) Duley v. Rizk et al
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Kelly Duley
Defendant:
Rizk and Medical Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duley v. Venegas et al
as 1:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kelly Duley
Defendant:
Venegas, Sandoval and Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Michael Hoiness v. Dr. Abdul Jalaludeen
as 23-6137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. HOINESS
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ABDUL JALALUDEEN, Physician, KATIE CARTWRIGHT, Physician's Assistant, J. DULEY, Registered Nurse and others
Defendant:
NAPHCARE, INC., Health Care Provider
Shaw v. James et al
as 2:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Aaron R. Shaw
Defendant:
Mr. James, Duley, C. Ampey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, R. Green, Midnight Captain and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Dyrell Godhigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mago v. Finnucan et al
as 3:2020cv01466
Defendant:
Rodriguez, Finnucan, Duley and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Mago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00488
Defendant:
Shaw, Jack, L. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duley v. Young et al
as 8:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Maurice Duley
Defendant:
Harold Young, Vernitia Dozier and Charles Govan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
