Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 654
Sanchez v. AHCC - Medical et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Defendant: Dr. Dant, AHCC - Medical and RN C Strand
Plaintiff: Alberto Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. PANCOAST et al
as 3:2024cv00204
Defendant: ZACHARY J. MOSLAK, DEPUTY MICHELLE IVICIC, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER R. WESTOVER and others
Plaintiff: DANTE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. GABBY
as 5:2024cv00163
Respondent: GABBY
Petitioner: DANTE ANTWAN HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watts v. Epps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv03913
Plaintiff: Dante Watts
Defendant: David Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. McKenzie
as 3:2024cv00376
Petitioner: Dante' Corvette Stone
Respondent: Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. McKenzie
as 3:2024cv00366
Respondent: Shawn McKenzie
Petitioner: Dante' Corvette Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russaw v. United States Marshal Service et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00352
Defendant: Joy Whatley, United States Marshal Service, Denzel Dixon and others
Plaintiff: Alexander Russaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Santa Clara County Jail
as 3:2024cv03475
Plaintiff: Dante Watts
Defendant: Santa Clara County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DAVIS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00167
Defendant: BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff: WILLIE DANTE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYO v. USA
as 1:2024cv01430
Petitioner: DECONDI DANTE MAYO
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?