Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Darryl Stinski v. Warden GDCP
as 22-12898
Petitioner / Appellant: DARRYL SCOTT STINSKI
Respondent / Appellee: GDCP WARDEN
SCOTT v. MOSER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00246
Petitioner: DARRYL SCOTT
Respondent: V. MOSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stinski v. Sellers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00066
Petitioner: Darryl Scott Stinski
Respondent: Eric Sellers and Eric C. Dozier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STINSKI v. CHATMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00409
Plaintiff: DARRYL SCOTT STINSKI
Defendant: BRUCE CHATMAN, KEITH EUTSEY, MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Gelb We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1953
Petitioner - Appellant: DARRYL SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee: BRUCE GELB, as Superintedent of Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Darryl Scott Chatman v. Edward Arnold We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05896
Respondent: Edward Arnold
Petitioner: Darryl Scott Chatman
Scott v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12746
Plaintiff: Darryl Scott
Defendant: UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Massachusetts Department of Correction & All Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Gelb We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv10306
Petitioner: Darryl Scott
Respondent: Bruce Gelb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darryl Scott Chatman v. Long Beach Police Officer Earnest et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv06123
Defendant: Booking Sgt, Police Officer Earnest, Jailer Sgt and others
Plaintiff: Darryl Scott Chatman
Darryl Scott v. R. Ground
as 11-15648
Petitioner - Appellant: DARRYL SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee: R. GROUNDS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?