Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gould v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
David Gould
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gould v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
David Gould
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gould v. Duarte
as 22-1943
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GOULD
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID DUARTE, Superintendent, MTC
Gould v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2019cv12227
Respondent:
Lisa Mitchell and Maura Healy
Petitioner:
David Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goodrick v. Field et al
as 1:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Al Ramirez, Campbell, Cindy Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow et al v. The County of Cayuga et al
as 9:2018cv00804
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sedore, Kevin Z. Daniels, Rondell D. Farrow, Jr. and others
Defendant:
The County of Cayuga, David Gould and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gould v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv00046
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
David Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gould v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Gould
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larkins v. County of Cayuga et al
as 9:2013cv00219
Plaintiff:
Ronald Larkins
Defendant:
County of Cayuga and David Gould
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gould
as 12-3202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Edward Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
David Gould, Sheriff, Cayuga County Jail, in his individual and official capacity, John Mack, Captain, Cayuga County Jail, in his individual and official capacity, John Gleason, Sergeant, Cayuga County Jail, in his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
