Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Horn v. Ford County Sheriff's Office
as 23-3068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID HORN
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Horn v. Ford County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2021cv02253
Plaintiff:
David Horn
Defendant:
Ford County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ricky Ewing v. David Horn
as 16-60777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY RONNELL EWING
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID HORN, Lieutenant
Slater v. Tyre, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00673
Plaintiff:
Demon Victorell Slater
Defendant:
Jason Tyre and David Horn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01910
Petitioner:
Gregory David Horne
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jesse Bond v. David Horne, et al
as 13-1379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE BOND
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID HORNE, Corrections Office (C.O.) State Correctional Institution ar Greene (SCI-Greene), Waynesburg, Pennsylvania (PA), JAMES LIPSCOMB, Lieutenant, JENKINS, First Name Unknown (FNU), Sergeant SCI-Greene, Waynesburg, PA and others
BOND v. HORNE et al
as 2:2011cv01342
Plaintiff:
JESSE DERRICK BOND
Defendant:
DAVID HORNE, EDWARD BOGDEN, KILBOURNE HANCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray Graham v. Rissie Owens, et al
as 09-51147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAY CURTIS GRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RISSIE OWENS, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Chairperson of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, STUART JENKINS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Director of the Parole Division of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, JOSE ALISEDA, JR., Individually and in his respective Official Capacity as a Member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Horne v. Johns
as 5:2009hc02157
Petitioner:
David Horne
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
