Cases 1 - 10 of 13
David James, Jr. v. Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
as 24-6479
Plaintiff:
DAVID RANDALL JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Duggins v. Pacheco et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
David Randall Duggins
Defendant:
Daniel V Pacheco, Thomas L Stevens and Traina L Slack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
as 7:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Randall James, Jr.
Defendant:
Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginal Paulk, Sr. v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 23-13750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINAL ANDREW PAULK, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKY D. DIXON, THOMAS REIMERS, ABIA IMESIT and others
Paulk v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv14313
Plaintiff:
Reginald Andrew Paulk
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, David Randall, Thomas Reimers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Ray et al
as 5:2023ct03066
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Ray, David Randall Newman, R. Gonzolaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborn #178862 v. Wishchuen et al
as 2:2020cv01155
Defendant:
Y Simpson, Pamela Olmstead, Unknown Wishchuen and others
Plaintiff:
David Randall Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Dubuque, City of et al
as 2:2019cv01020
Defendant:
David Randall, Wendy Lyons, Kelly Francois and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Jones et al
as 2:2016cv14077
Petitioner:
Jorge Gomez
Respondent:
Julie L. Jones, Wexford Health Sources, Oluge Ogunsanwo, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prater v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv00810
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, J. Shunbert, Stuart K. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
