Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AMOS v. BYRD et al
as 2:2021cv00264
Defendant:
NURSE KIMBERLY HOBSON, NURSE L. CUPP, WEXFORD CORR. SERV. and others
Plaintiff:
ROYAL AMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01404
Petitioner:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Respondent:
DR. JACKIE WEST-DENNING, KIM HOBSON, DR. NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSIER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE/AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, et al
as 5:2020cv00308
Defendant:
GLOBAL ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES GROUP INC, MOORE, PAMALA MALCOLM and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R MOSIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Anastassiou et al
as 2:2020at00349
Defendant:
DOES, Dr. Peter Anastassiou and Dr. Samuel Wong
Plaintiff:
Ralph Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosier v. Georgia Department of Correctional Healthcare/Augusta University Hospital et al
as 4:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Global Economic Opportunities Group, Inc, Pamala Malcolm, Georgia Department of Correctional Healthcare/Augusta University Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Mosier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry
as 18-6285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK L. PERRY, BEVERLY STUBBS, RN, DR. SAMI HASSAN and others
Defendant:
DR. CHARLES STEWART, PETER B. WOGLOM, DR ARTHUR DAVIS and others
ADAMS v. CORIZON HEALTHCARE et al
as 2:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
TERRY T. ADAMS, SR.
Defendant:
DR. SAMUEL BYRD, CORIZON HEALTHCARE, LUNDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Pearson v. Prison Health Service, et al
as 16-1140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, SOMERSET HOSPITAL, MEDICAL DIRECTOR MCGRATH and others
Welch v. Brown et al
as 9:2008cv01055
Plaintiff:
Elbert Welch
Defendant:
Sergeant Brown, LaBriola, Khahaifa and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
