Cases 1 - 10 of 474
Ewing v. Back et al
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Steven Guy Ewing
Defendant:
J. Back and Tammy W. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing et al v. Byrd et al
as 3:2024cv50213
Plaintiff:
Javion Ewing and Jazariah Lyles
Defendant:
David Byrd, City of DeKalb, DeKalb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Mobley v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5477
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOBLEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN F. J. BOWERS, FCI Memphis and others
Coe v. Ewing et al
as 7:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
John M. Ewing, Sherin Dackairaj, Nadia Maria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Bittick et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Bittick, Unknown Lawton, Mayor Dinah Tatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. Medical Staff et al
as 5:2023ct03315
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Whitehead
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sheriff Hans Miller, Lt. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bosman et al v. Ewing et al
as 4:2023cv04919
Plaintiff:
Donald Bosman and Regina Bosman
Defendant:
Officer Rebecca Ewing, Myrtle Beach, City of, Myrtle Beach Police Department, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ewing v. Lemaster
as 0:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Ewing
Respondent:
D. Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Red Ball Oxygen et al
as 5:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wesley Banks
Defendant:
Red Ball Oxygen, Alex Kennedy, Edward Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
