Cases 1 - 10 of 55
HARNEY v. HORTH et al
as 2:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Respondent:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARIES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY SCHULTZ, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Montgomery
as 7:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Marcus F Miller
Defendant:
Chedonna Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY SCHULTZ, CHARLES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. NCF et al
as 1:2021cv01794
Defendant:
FREDERICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towery v. Miller Jr
as 5:2021cv00064
Defendant:
John F Miller Jr
Plaintiff:
Doshee Swan Towery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Benton et al
as 4:2020cv00260
Plaintiff:
James F. Miller, II
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison, Head Warden Brooks Benton, Deputy Warden Glynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Hill et al
as 1:2020cv02531
Defendant:
Kristofer Davis, Commissioner Wayne Hill, Lander Walley and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Kelly
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Perry v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2020cv00330
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Parole Board and Charles F Miller
Plaintiff:
Darnell Perry
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
