Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,530
Ware v. Jennings et al
as 4:2024cv00846
Plaintiff: Supastar Ware
Defendant: E. Jennings, H. Turner, Unknown Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01448
Petitioner: Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Freeman v. USA
as 24-5560
Petitioner: MICHAEL A. FREEMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv03533
Plaintiff: Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant: Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01425
Petitioner: Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albert Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution
as 24-6557
Plaintiff: ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant: FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HUDGINS, Sergeant, MOTLEY, Correctional Officer and others
Evans v. Lamar et al
as 3:2024cv00590
Plaintiff: Evans Demetrius Paris
Defendant: Lawlson Lamar, Sarah Freeman, Dorothy Sedgwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00507
Petitioner: Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff: Hunter Dixon
Defendant: Wallens Ridge State Prison, J. Artrip, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raynor v. Bertie County et al
as 5:2024ct03142
Plaintiff: Jaronta Javar Raynor
Defendant: Bertie County, L. Freeman and Mr. Whitehurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?