Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Cullen v. Wall et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Fathi Mushapha Cullen and Larry D. Alford Jr
Defendant:
John Wall, John Hellman, John Crace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullen v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Fathi Mushapha Cullen
Defendant:
Jane Jones, John Holmstrom, John Vanderlaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABUSHERAIAH v. LUSCH
as 2:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
FATHI ABUSHERAIAH
Defendant:
TOM LUSCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
(PC)Sikta v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2021cv00238
Defendant:
County of Sacramento and Rio Consumnes Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Laith Fathi Sikta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billy Rae Shandee Maldonado v. Asucion Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv07464
Defendant:
M. Lewis, Asucion Johnson, M. Mijangeo and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Rae Shandee Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devin Andrich v. ACLU National Prison Project, et al
as 18-15354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Defendant - Appellee:
ACLU NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT, is a foreign entity with its principal place of business in Washington DC, PRISON LAW OFFICE, a California Corporation in Berkeley, California, DONALD SPECTER, is a California attorney employed by defendant Prison Law Office in Berkley, California and others
Fathi #543158 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Duraid Haithem Fathi #543158
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duraid Fathi v. Randall Haa
as 16-2604
Petitioner - Appellant:
DURAID HAITHEM FATHI, aka Duraid Haitham Fathi
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL HAAS, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv30096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
