Cases 1 - 10 of 1,057
Fitzgerald v. Jane Doe et al
as 5:2024ct03130
Plaintiff:
Shawreed Jawon Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and John Doe Deputy Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Luking et al
as 3:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Darius Lee Pierce
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Luking, Nurse Fitzgerald, Mark Shima and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LONG v. FITZGERALD
as 2:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LONG
Defendant:
RICHARD FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canady v. Figuera et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Canady
Defendant:
Ivan Figuera, Paola Castro, Shelly Amador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Fitzgerald Pace
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr and Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID **TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN**
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
