Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Roby III v. Vandergriff
as 4:2020cv01010
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Petitioner:
Frank R Roby III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nordlund v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2019cv00065
Defendant:
Does 1-5, State of Washington, ARNP Sandra Conner and others
Plaintiff:
Frank R Nordlund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrell v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00800
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, FNU Martinez and New Mexico, State of
Petitioner:
Frank R. Morrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coley v. Cooper et al
as 5:2018ct03047
Plaintiff:
Roger Earl Coley
Defendant:
Annie Cooper, Froist Knight, Brian Patrick Livecchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
as 1:2018cv00251
Petitioner:
Frank R. Castillo
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Defendant:
Hatton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Castillo v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
as 5:2017cv07109
Plaintiff:
Frank R. Castillo
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Owens v. State of Iowa
as 4:2017cv00380
Petitioner:
Frank R Owens
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stevenson v. Capra
as 1:2017cv05251
Respondent:
Superintendent Michael Capra
Petitioner:
Frank R. Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POWELL v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2016cv04428
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWELL
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER, CHARLES ELLIS, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Bishop et al
as 1:2015cv02626
Petitioner:
Melvin William Thomas, Jr.
Respondent:
Frank R. Bishop and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
