Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Cedric Garnett Johnson v. Travis Pennington et al
as 5:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cedric Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Pennington, D. Mortimer, D. Tristan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Criddle v. Jackson County Sheriff Office, et al
as 24-1476
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Criddle
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Office, Ruth Ann Dickerson, David James and others
Bowes-Northern v. Garnett et al
as 1:2023cv16641
Petitioner:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Respondent:
Chales Truitt and Jason Garnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. GARNETT
as 1:2023cv02002
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ANDERSON
Defendant:
PAUL GARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnett v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Barron Garnett
Defendant:
Michael Downey, Kankakee County, Jerome Combs Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Criddle v. Jackson County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Criddle
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Office, Ruth Ann Dickerson, David James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Zeas v. Jason Garnett
as 23-1767
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES J. ZEAS
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON GARNETT, Chief of Parole for the Illinois Department of Corrections
Younger v. Garnett
as 1:2023cv02268
Petitioner:
Antione Younger
Respondent:
People of The State of Illinois and Jason Garnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Matt Garnett and Matt Garrett
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
