Cases 1 - 10 of 206
Belmonte v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Damers Shirak Duranzan and David Belmonte
Defendant:
King County, King County Department of Public Defense, Anita Khandelwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldsmith v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Holly Goldsmith
Defendant:
Harris County and Harris County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart II v. Goldsmith et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Robert E Stewart II
Defendant:
Bob Goldsmith, Quality Correctional Care and Thomas Lehman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldsmith v. Hill County et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Sharon Goldsmith
Defendant:
Hill County, Jamie Ross, Randall Lycan and others
Cross Plaintiff:
Ryan Stewart
Cross Defendant:
Jesse Shane Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas Davis v. Brooks Goldsmith
as 23-7214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REV. THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKS P. GOLDSMITH, Judge of Circuits Courts/Retired, RACHEL DEANGELIS, Asst. Solicitor/State Prosecutor, CHRISTIAN D. ANDERSON, Beaufort County Sheriff Dept. and others
Bartole v. Goldsmith
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Bartole
Defendant:
Bob Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Moffett v. Michael Dittman, et al
as 23-2985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER J.D. MOFFETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DITTMAN, BRANDON BORTZ, RUSSELL GOLDSMITH and others
Goldsmith v. Garrett et al
as 1:2023cv14429
Plaintiff:
Robert W Goldsmith
Defendant:
James Garrett, S. Magee, Illinois Prisoner Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
