Cases 1 - 10 of 4,167
Hughes v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03249
Defendant:
Sheriff Graham Atkinson, Darren Jackson and Gregory Moss, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Colby S. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Defendant:
Scrolls, Joseph Hughes, Jeannie Long and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Machelle Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02235
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Edwards
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., John Doe, Ashley Darnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sandhu v. Sandhu, et al.
as 1:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Singh Sandhu
Defendant:
Kapur C. Sandhu, Gujer Valdez Sandhu, Lashmae Sandhu-Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Hughes
as 1:2024cv09911
Plaintiff:
John Adams
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cochran v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03283
Defendant:
. Greene and LaToya Hughes
Plaintiff:
Roy Cochran, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Classification Staff et al
as 0:2024cv05778
Defendant:
F. Jury, Classification Staff, Director of (SCDC) and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Emmett v. Hughes Mailroom Supervisor et al
as 6:2024cv00542
Defendant:
Myra Walker, John/Jane Doe, Huges Kitchen Captain or Major and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Hughes
as 1:2024cv09790
Plaintiff:
Zachary Watts
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Olson v. Ball et al
as 1:2024cv01283
Defendant:
Denita Ball, Officer Santiago, Officer Wooden and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Luther Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
