Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Addison v. Armstrong
as 2:2024cv03623
Plaintiff:
Jerome Addison
Defendant:
Julie J. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 2:2024cv11555
Plaintiff:
Carl J. Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Carl J. Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Waukesha County Jail Nursing Staff
as 2:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Dreacy J Armstrong
Defendant:
Waukesha County Jail Nursing Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ludwick v. Teague et al
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Ludwick
Defendant:
Capt. Brandon Teague, C.O. Nathan Rook, C.O. Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. MacDougall Corr. Inst et al
as 0:2023cv03255
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
MacDougall Corr. Inst, Lee Correctional Institution, Ridgeland Corr. Inst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lashley v. Armstrong
as 9:2023cv00772
Petitioner:
Michael Aspield Lashley and Michael Asfield Lashley
Defendant:
Julie J. Armstrong
Respondent:
Director of the Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darrell Goss v. Julie Armstrong
as 22-7387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL L. GOSS
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIE J. ARMSTRONG, Charleston County Clerk of Court and ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General
Armstrong v. LSP et al
as 3:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Caleb J. Armstrong
Defendant:
LSP and Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goss v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2021cv00900
Defendant:
Julie J Armstrong and Alan Wilson
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
