Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Michael Johnson v. Brian Barney, et al
as 24-3287
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BARNEY, JASON JOSEPH, WILLIAM COOL and others
Kelemen v. Hamlin et al
as 6:2023cv01916
Petitioner:
Jason Joseph Kelemen
Defendant:
John Hamlin, William Marshall, Melanie McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Weber et al
as 6:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Wilson
Defendant:
Connor Weber, Chase Hershey, Enes Mrzljak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Weber et al
as 4:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Wilson
Defendant:
Connor Weber, Chase Hershey, Enes Mrzljak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Joy Harris
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville Davidson County, Tennessee and Jason Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Barney et al
as 1:2021cv00141
Defendant:
William Cool, Brian Barney, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodrigue v. Neal et al
as 2:2020cv01811
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter, T Schwausch, Stephen Bergeron and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Rodrigue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougald v. Erdos et al
as 1:2018cv00135
Defendant:
Ron Erdos, Jason Joseph, L. Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Jerone McDougald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
as 2:2016cv00451
Petitioner:
JASON JOSEPH SMITH
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. United States Probation Office for the Southern District of Florida
as 3:2016cv01289
Petitioner:
Jason Joseph Smith
Respondent:
United States Probation Office for the Southern District of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
