Cases 1 - 10 of 25
James Noel, Jr. v. Indiana Metro Police Department, et al
as 22-2724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA and others
NOEL v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01771
Petitioner:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Respondent:
INDIANA STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noel v. Indiana Metro Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
James Frank Noel, Jr and James F Noel, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana Metro Police Department, Indianapolis City of, Marion County and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOEL v. GREEN et al
as 1:2019cv04824
Defendant:
MYLA A. ELDRIDGE, FRANKLIN WOOTEN, KENNETH GREER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Druggan v. USA
as 2:2019cv03799
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James F. Druggan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Akelkok v. Dunleavy et al
as 3:2019cv00181
Defendant:
William F. Morse, Mike Dunleavy, James F. Hartmann, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Akelkok, Jr.
DAVIDSON v. MEGROTA et al
as 1:2018cv02062
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. DAVIDSON, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES MASSARONE, ANUJA MEGROTA and TARSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broomfield v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00042
Petitioner:
James F. Broomfield, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harding v. Cumberland County Municipality et al
as 5:2016ct03005
Plaintiff:
Sylvester E. Harding, III
Defendant:
Cumberland County Municipality, City of Fayetteville, Fayetteville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Sullivan County Medical et al
as 3:2015cv00583
Plaintiff:
James F Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Sullivan County Medical, Sullivan County Correctional Center, C Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
