Prisoner Petitions Cases
YARULLINA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff: ILMIYA YARULLINA
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DIRECTOR JAMES M. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James M. Murray v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2023cv09749
Petitioner: James M. Murray
Respondent: Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James M. Murray v. Warden B. Birkholz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02139
Petitioner: James M. Murray
Respondent: Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Grishan v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv06156
Defendant: Members of US Congress, John Doe Director of DEA, Judge Barry Bryant and others
Plaintiff: Richard Albert Grishan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burchfield v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv06150
Defendant: Members of US Congress, John Doe Director of DEA, Judge Barry Bryant and others
Plaintiff: Bradley C. Burchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Bledsoe, et al
as 12-2246
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES M. MURRAY, a/k/a James Hines
Respondent - Appellee: B.A. BLEDSOE, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Murray v. Bledsoe, et al
as 12-2245
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES M. MURRAY, a/k/a James Hines
Respondent - Appellee: B.A. BLEDSOE and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
James Murray v. Harvey Lappin
as 08-6456
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES M. MURRAY, a/k/a James Hines
Respondent - Appellee: HARVEY LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Murray v. Lappin
as 5:2007cv00006
Petitioner: James M. Murray
Respondent: Harvey Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?