Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
English v. Hughes et al
as 2:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
Josiah English, III
Defendant:
Jason Hughes, Jason House, Unknown Muhammadi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kayser, Christian v. Hughes, Jason et al
as 3:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Christian Roth Kayser
Defendant:
Jason Hughes and Modou Ngum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tipton v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv02255
Plaintiff:
Gary Tipton
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Tim McConnahay, Julie Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tipton v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv04178
Plaintiff:
Gary Tipton
Defendant:
Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Tim McConnahay, Julie Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tipton v. Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center et al
as 2:2022cv02854
Plaintiff:
Gary Tipton
Defendant:
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Dr. Jim Doe, Dr. Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lucas v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00606
Defendant:
Warden Baca, Jason Hughes and Nevada Division of Forestry
Plaintiff:
Jervon Ray Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Dinius et al
as 0:2013cv00516
Petitioner:
James Paul Campbell
Respondent:
Joe Dinius, Public Storage, Brady Sweitzer and others
Hughes v. Adams
as 3:2007cv04442
Plaintiff:
Daylen Jason Hughes
Defendant:
Derral Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duran v. Kwitti et al
as 6:2007cv00134
Plaintiff:
David Duran
Defendant:
Chimidi A. Kwitti and Jason Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
