Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Bell v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Jaylen Dalaino Bell
Respondent:
United States and Jackson County of Ripley, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hickman v. A.C.C./A.S.P.C.A. et al
as 1:2024cv02825
Plaintiff:
Quandell Hickman
Defendant:
A.C.C./A.S.P.C.A., Jaylen and Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. USA
as 1:2024cv00607
Petitioner:
Jaylen Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Coleman v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jaylen Monzell Coleman
Defendant:
Latoya Johnson, Corey D Haynie, Quintin Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Hale et al
as 4:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Jaylen M Lewis
Defendant:
E Hale and A Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Thompson
as 4:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jaylen M Lewis
Defendant:
Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Pope County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jaylen M Lewis
Defendant:
Pope County Detention Center, Brad Grittion, Reyna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinson v. Colbert
as 3:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jaylen Vinson
Defendant:
Warden D. Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NELSON v. WHITE et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
BAVARIOUS KEJUAN NELSON
Defendant:
JAYLEN WHITE, MARCUS WILLIAMS, MARIO WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blutcher v. Corizon Medical et al
as 6:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jaylen L. Blutcher
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, K. Whiting, C. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
