Cases 1 - 10 of 10,322
Cantu v. USA
as 3:2024cv01217
Petitioner:
Christopher Joe Cantu
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Medical Department of Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lockhart v. Whittle et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Lockhart
Defendant:
Chris Whittle and Officer Marley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony R. Trejo
Defendant:
U.S. President Joe Biden, U.S. Vice President, Texas Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Martinez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-11555
Petitioner:
JOE MARTINEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jean-Louis v. Board of Education
as 1:2024cv03755
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Jean-Louis
Respondent:
Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. VANGORDER
as 1:2024cv00408
Petitioner:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Respondent:
VANGORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnathan Wheeler v. Joe Williams, et al
as 24-11520
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN ALLEN WHEELER
Defendant:
JOE WILLIAMS, GREGORY DAVIS, DEREK CLUPPER and others
Caraffa #350727 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
