Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KING v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A KING
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, LOUIS SCHOFILL and JOHN TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Precythe et al
as 5:2021cv06019
Defendant:
John Shirrell, Elizabeth Atterberry, John Tucker and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson E Hopkins, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardee v. Mnuchin et al
as 3:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and Steven T. Mnuchin
Plaintiff:
John Tucker Hardee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
John Tucker Martin
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc., John Harler, Dayna Vango and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Sheets et al
as 3:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Tucker Martin
Defendant:
Clifton Sheets, M. A. Claveau, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Harles et al
as 3:2013cv00809
Plaintiff:
John Tucker Martin
Defendant:
John Harles, MD and Conmed Healthcare Mgt. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Tucker et al
as 6:2013cv03081
Plaintiff:
Matthew Quinn Mason
Defendant:
John Tucker, Deatherage, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Maiten v. Tucker
as 1:2011cv00305
Plaintiff:
Roddricus Cordell Maiten
Defendant:
John Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swann et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00264
Plaintiff:
Blake O Swann, Steve Mcelyea, Robert Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Chad Johnson, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Officer McKenizy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. NORTHERN STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2007cv04970
Petitioner:
JOHN TUCKER
Defendant:
NORTHERN STATE PRISON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
