Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Johnson v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Petitioner:
Jonathan Johnson
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Jonathan Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Marcum v. Bolen et al
as 2:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Marcum
Defendant:
C.O. John Bolen and C.O. Jonathan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Metzger et al
as 1:2022cv01567
Petitioner:
Jonathan Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Dana Metzger and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00119
Petitioner:
Jonathan Johnson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith, et al v. Roadway Inn, et al
as 3:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith, MShafer@FBI.gov, Mr. f/n/u Reed and others
Defendant:
Roadway Inn, Lowes, Walgreens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MALTA et al
as 1:2022cv04191
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
DR. RAYMOND MALTA, DR. LISA R. MILLS, DR. SHERITY L. COLLIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. O'Hagan-Wolfe et al
as 1:2021cv10783
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Johnson
Defendant:
Catherine O'Hagan-Wolfe, Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts and Case Manager for the United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Johnson v. Warden, Broad River
as 12-7563
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
BILL BYARS, Director, SC Dept. of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
