Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. White et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant:
Eric K White and FNU Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crandle v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
James Dlester Crandle
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Capt. Surles, Lt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Jordan et al
as 6:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
Todd Jermane Thomas
Defendant:
J. Jordan, K. Whiting, Dr. Gilete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03204
Plaintiff:
Greg H. Johnson
Defendant:
Sergeant Cooper, A. Threat, Officer Canon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bishop
as 23-10607
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raylon Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Ricky Bishop, Sheriff, FNU Blair, Correctional Officer, FNU Olson, Sgt and others
Jordan v. YesCare et al
as 6:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Theopholus H. Jordan and Theopholus Jordan
Defendant:
YesCare, K. Whiting, C. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blutcher v. Corizon Medical et al
as 6:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jaylen L. Blutcher
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, K. Whiting, C. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Corizon Medical et al
as 6:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Theopholus H. Jordan
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, K. Whiting, C. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tineo v. White et al
as 3:2023cv08009
Plaintiff:
David Tineo
Defendant:
K White, Unknown Sweet, Unknown White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
