Cases 1 - 10 of 375
Edwards v. Keen et al
as 4:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Daniel Keen, Medical David Unknown, Medical Sarah Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WALLACE BRYANT
Defendant:
SWAIN, KENNEDY, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Swain et al
as 8:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Justin Wallace Bryant
Defendant:
Swain, Kennedy, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karsten Allen v. T. Norvell
as 24-6541
Plaintiff:
KARSTEN OBED ALLEN
Defendant:
T. NORVELL, Sergeant, Housing Unit B at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. MULLINS, Correctional Officer, Housing Unit B at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, G. V. HORNE, Lieutenant at Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
Jermaine Reaves v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 24-6517
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE D. REAVES
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, M. KEEN, Keefe Employee and KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Reaves v. Red Onion State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Reaves
Defendant:
Red Onion State Prison, Virginia Department of Corrections, Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mario Keene
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walton v. Keen
as 4:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
DeAndre D. Walton
Defendant:
Daniel Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
CeCil Keen
Defendant:
Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
