Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Carter v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00511
Respondent: Sheriff Eddy Lange
Petitioner: Kenneth Lloyd Carter, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00500
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. USA
as 3:2017cv00171
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: KENNETH IRVING CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carter v. Division of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03743
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Carter
Defendant: Division of Corrections, David Ballard and Tom Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Ashley-Palmertree et al
as 3:2017cv00131
Plaintiff: Kenneth Dewayne Carter
Defendant: Shelly Ashley-Palmertree, Warren County Board of Supervisors, Josie Mayfield Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Prime Care Medical We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01337
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Carter
Defendant: Prime Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. State of West Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00332
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Carter
Defendant: State of West Virginia, Charleston Police Dept. Officers, Andrew W. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2016cv00266
Plaintiff: Kenneth D. Carter
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Denmark
as 3:2014cv00602
Petitioner: Kenneth DeWayne Carter
Respondent: Johnnie Denmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Ballard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv11952
Petitioner: Kenneth E. Carter
Respondent: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?