Cases 1 - 10 of 131
King #225645 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00526
Petitioner:
Terrance L King
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Braxton v. Marnitta King
as 23-7098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
Marnitta L. King
King v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Cedric L. King
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harris v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Lance Jermaine Harris
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as Jody L. King and U.S. Attorney General doing business as Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James Martin, Jr. v. M. King
as 23-6200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN M. L. KING, MS. BROWN-STROBEE, YVONNE LANE and others
King v. Crawford et al
as 4:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. King
Defendant:
Sean Crawford and Shawn Howard
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Bobby
as 5:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Deny L. King
Respondent:
Dave Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez-Rocha v. King
as 5:2023hc02026
Petitioner:
Jose Gomez-Rocha
Respondent:
Malinda L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KING v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND REHABILITATION et al
as 2:2022cv05918
Plaintiff:
DEONDRAE L. KING
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND REHABILITATION and OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. McGraw
as 1:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
Karl L. King
Defendant:
Attorney Brian R. McGraw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
