Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Henry Washington v. Kansky Delsima, et al
as 22-1874
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON, is and at all times was mentioned herein a prisoner of the State of Pennsylvania in the custody of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, currently confined in SCI Somerset in Somerset PA
Defendant / Appellee:
KANSKY DELSIMA, WILLIAM BOWERS, PHILLIP MAUST and others
James Kelly v. Brian Hong, et al
as 22-15386
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES CARL KELLY
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN HONG, CRAIG R. LAREN, WARDEN, Salinas Valley State Prison and others
Kelly v. Warden at Salinas Valley State Prison et al
as 3:2021cv06438
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Warden at Salinas Valley State Prison, Brian Hong, Craig R. Laren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Burgess
as 2:2021cv11254
Respondent:
Michael Burgess
Petitioner:
Laren Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Yarbrough v. United States
as 4:2021cv00712
Petitioner:
Laren Yarbrough
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Livingston v. Gilbert et al
as 4:2020cv00522
Defendant:
Julie Pratt, Collin Price, Lacey Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Colby Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Jenkins
as 3:2020cv01532
Petitioner:
Maria Laren Henry and Maria Isberg
Respondent:
W.Z. Jenkins, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WASHINGTON v. DELISMA et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
ROXANNE PLAYSO, OFFICER FETTERMAN, BRIAN P. HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Martin v. Kanode et al
as 2:2018cv00111
Petitioner:
Javon Laren Martin
Respondent:
Barry Kanode and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Satz et al
as 0:2015cv62249
Plaintiff:
Morris Eugene Phillips
Defendant:
Micheal Satz, Micheal Rothschild, Howard Finklestein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
