Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Richard Lee Austin, Jr. v. Edward Borla
as 8:2023cv02455
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Austin and Richard Lee Austin, Jr.
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merritt Lee Austin v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv06453
Plaintiff:
Merritt Lee Austin
Defendant:
United States of America, Jaspal Dhawliwal, Jason Christopher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Harden v. KY, et al
as 17-5637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HARDEN, Biological Father of C.H.H. and H.M.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, LEE AUSTIN, Social Worker, in Official Capacity and others
Harden v. State of Kentucky et al
as 3:2016cv00640
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Lee Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Davis
as 5:2016cv00118
Petitioner:
Edward Lee Austin
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AUSTIN v. USA
as 1:2015cv02018
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE AUSTIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
AUSTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv01886
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE AUSTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
AUSTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv01670
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE AUSTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Austin v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00538
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Austin
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Deputy Warden Emig and Phillip Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUSTIN v. WHITTING et al
as 2:2010cv00712
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE AUSTIN
Defendant:
WHITTING and ALL MEDICAL MALPRACTICE & DELAYED DIAGNOSIS OF HEPATITIS HBU, HBV LIVER VIRUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
