Cases 1 - 10 of 5,343
RUIZ v. MONMOUTH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2024cv09342
Defendant:
IHRHIEM IANH, MR. DAN, MONMOUTH COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON S. RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCorkle v. Martin et al
as 1:2024cv01334
Defendant:
Sheri Martin, Lisa Drapper, . May and others
Plaintiff:
Arnez McCorkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv03713
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Williamson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv01121
Defendant:
Chris Gray, f/n/u Aper, Lisa Carson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. CENTURION OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01606
Defendant:
JOHN MERSHON, SINIKWEYINKOSI MABANDALA, CENTURION OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv02445
Defendant:
Kris Mayes and Russell Skinner
Plaintiff:
Lisa Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Squellati v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01326
Defendant:
Ryan Bohm, All Members of Livingston County Board, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
William Squellati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Page v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01325
Defendant:
John Doe, Lisa Draper, John and or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Quincy Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. THORNTON ET AL
as 1:2024cv01524
Defendant:
THORNTON, MS. DANIELS and LISA BLUNT
Plaintiff:
TOBY MAXWELL and TOBY T. MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Worley et al
as 1:2024cv01060
Defendant:
Captain Lisa Worley and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Plaintiff:
Raymond Douglas Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
