Cases 1 - 10 of 1,397
Logan v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04052
Petitioner:
Shatina Ann Logan
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diez v. TDCJ
as 24-40350
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, McConnell Unit Mailroom Supervisor Ms. Salles, McConnell Unit Unknown Mailroom Staff and others
Sashinger v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Crystal Sashinger
Defendant:
c/o Logan, Warden Reubart, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Not Yet Classified:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
J.D Roberson, D.R Clark, LeAnn Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sashinger v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Crystal M Sashinger
Defendant:
Logan, Warden Reubart, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan Dyjak v. Grace Hou, et al
as 24-1816
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
GRACE HOU and LANA MILLER
Logan v. Tallant et al
as 4:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Shatina Ann Logan
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jana Tallant, Chief Deputy Joey Davis, APRN Joan McClean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petrov v. Graves et al
as 3:2024cv03114
Plaintiff:
Mila Petrov
Defendant:
. Graves and Logan Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seger v. People of the State et al
as 3:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Logan S. Seger
Respondent:
People of the State, Department of Human Services and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
