Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shores (PS) v. Colorado Department of Correction et al
as 1:2023cv02540
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Shores
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Correction, Dean Williams, Core Civics America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lam III v. Finn et al
as 4:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
James Lam III and James Lam, III
Defendant:
Det. Sgt. Ralph E. Finn, Ofc. Greg Palovick, Officer Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lam v. Finn et al
as 4:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
James Lam, III
Defendant:
Det. Sgt. Ralph E. Finn, Ofc. Greg Palovick, Unknown Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lam v. Finn et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Ofc. Greg Palovick, Ofc. Unknown Allen, Stephan Lawhorn and others
Plaintiff:
James Lam, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otis v. TDCJ et al
as 6:2019cv00375
Defendant:
TDCJ, Texas Government, Greg Abbott, United States Government and others
Plaintiff:
Kerron Lovern Otis and Kerron Lavern Otis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Clarke et al
as 2:2018cv00552
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Barry Marano, Vandermark and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene D. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00408
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Nurse Mays, Sergeant Tisdale and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene D. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Chautauqua County NY et al
as 6:2018cv06326
Plaintiff:
Stephen Easley
Defendant:
Chautauqua County NY, Chautauqua County Jail, Loverne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovern v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2017cv00849
Plaintiff:
Anthony Earl Lovern
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnston v. Dooley et al
as 4:2015cv04126
Plaintiff:
David H. Johnston
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Dennis Kaemingk, Marty Jackley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
