Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Tyler Henderson v. Union County Courts, et al
as 23-1298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYLER M. HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNION COUNTY COURTS and TYLER TRIPP
Henderson v. Union County Courts et al
as 3:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Tyler M. Henderson
Defendant:
Union County Courts and Tyler Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESTAND v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
JAMON HESTAND
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Officer Curtis D. Bitz, Officer Candace Stevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jumpp v. Gagne et al
as 3:2020cv01298
Defendant:
Craig Burns, Ronald Cotta, Sandra Menders and others
Plaintiff:
Junior Jumpp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Mahally et al
as 1:2019cv01468
Defendant:
Lawrence P Mahally, George Miller, Dipti Amin and others
Plaintiff:
Daysean M. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv00910
Defendant:
Davis and Newberry County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Antonio M Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Baltimore County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv03512
Defendant:
Baltimore County Police Dept., Steven Scheinin, Sandra A. O'Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Randolph v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2018cv00968
Defendant:
S. Wilson, V. Benavides, C. Sandoval and others
Plaintiff:
Colin M. Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2018cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Barnes , David A. Banks , Demetrius K. Harper and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, C.R. Goetz, C.R. (I) Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Lor et al
as 2:2016cv02833
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Henderson
Defendant:
Lor and Mac Lamera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
