Cases 1 - 10 of 354
Evanoff v. DeKalb County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Defendant:
Mayer of Auburn In, B. Christian, Jared Urlick and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Evanoff and Carl R Evanoff
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Missouri Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Martin Shaw, David A. Stuerman and Benny R. Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Trowbridge, Brandon Moore, Missouri Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sedillo v. Summit Foods Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Defendant:
Roseanne Otero, Summit Foods Inc., FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert J Sedillo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUNCAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUNCAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LARRY KRASNER and JOSH MAYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olden v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Terrance Olden
Defendant:
Cameron Avery, Scott Jackson, . French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rothschild v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv01099
Petitioner:
Mayer A. Rothschild and Thomas A. Cady
Respondent:
State of California and Steven Wagstaffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayers v. Warden Antonelli
as 0:2024cv01033
Petitioner:
Breon Mayers
Respondent:
Warden Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayers v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv01240
Petitioner:
Breon Jacoby Mayers
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ista v. Eagan Police Dept. et al
as 0:2023cv03771
Plaintiff:
Jason Carl Ista
Defendant:
Eagan Police Dept., City of Eagan, Dakota County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
