Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Williams et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2021cv09586
Plaintiff:
Mr. Talib Williams and Dimario Pickford
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR Kathleen Allison, Warden Craig Koenig and others
Intervenor:
Milton William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whorley et al v. Northam et al
as 3:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brummett, Felipe Franco, Dwight Horton and others
Defendant:
Tori Raiford, Brian J. Moran, Eric Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00690
Plaintiff:
Andrew Milton Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MAGWOOD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00613
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L MAGWOOD
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , JOHN PALMER , JEFFREY MCCLELLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton Ringgenberg v. United State
as 11-2012
Petitioner - Appellant:
Milton William Ringgenberg
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Williams v. Benton
as 3:2010cv00184
Plaintiff:
Milton Williams
Defendant:
Sherry Benton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Gaudenzia Treatment Program et al
as 8:2008cv03401
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Burrell
Defendant:
Gaudenzia Treatment Program, Michael Harie, Gayle Saler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. BAXTER, ET AL
as 5:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
MILTON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BAXTER, BUSH and CORY SKINNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WILLINGHAM
as 5:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
MILTON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Ozmint
as 8:2007cv01168
Petitioner:
Milton William Thompson
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
