Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Lettieri v. Matson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Karen Matson, The Broome County Humane Society, David Gaska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Matson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hung Duong Nguon et al v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2023cv09937
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Robert Luna, Nicolas Sererato, Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Matson
as 23-679
Petitioner / Appellant:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent / Appellee:
Karen Matson
Lettieri v. Matson
as 9:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Karen Matson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Otero v. Matson et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ryan Eamon Otero
Defendant:
Matson, F Cooper and T Buntion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OTERO v. MATSON et al
as 4:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
RYAN EAMON OTERO
Defendant:
MATSON, F COOPER and T BUNTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
APPLETON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
SHARNEE APPLETON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, BEDWELL, L. WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EL v. MATSON et al
as 2:2021cv01325
Plaintiff:
RYSHEIRD MALIK EL, RYSHEID MALIK EX REL BALDWIN and RYSHEID MALIK EL
Defendant:
NICHOLAS MATSON, JEFFEY GRANTZ, GEORGE LOWTHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Roe v. Johnson County
as 21-10890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Roe
Defendant / Appellee:
Johnson County, Southwestern Correctional, L.L.C., doing business as LaSalle Corrections, L.L.C., doing business as Lasalle Southwest Corrections, LaSalle Management Company, L.L.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
