Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Mayweather v. USA
as 1:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Larcentursa Mayweather
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Swinton v. Mayweather et al
as 4:2022cv03922
Plaintiff:
Eric Keyon Swinton
Defendant:
Lt. Eric Mayweather and Lt. Charles Tennison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jarmell Mayweather v. United States
as 22-2128
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jarmell Raymond Mayweather
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Mayweather v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramon Thomas Mayweather
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Sara Hugo and Barbara Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayweather v. USA
as 0:2021cv02355
Petitioner:
Jarmell Raymond Mayweather
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mayweather v. Schmealing
as 2:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramon Thomas Mayweather
Defendant:
Christopher Schmealing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Gibran Mayweather v. Detective M., et al
as 2:2020cv04786
Defendant:
Isaac Spellman, Jim, Richard Barnwell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gibran Mayweather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Warden et al
as 3:2020cv00305
Defendant:
Farlee, Westville Office of Internal Affairs, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Quintin J Mayweather-Brown and Quintin J Mayweather-Brown - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Galipeau
as 3:2020cv00153
Plaintiff:
Quintin J Mayweather-Brown and Quintin J Mayweather-Brown - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS
Defendant:
John Galipeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ivory v. Davita Dialysis et al
as 2:2019cv02268
Defendant:
Elizabeth Miranda, Carmen Gastello, Angelo Niro and others
Plaintiff:
Donta Deon Ivory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
