Cases 1 - 10 of 256
Raybourn v. Centurion Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv06072
Plaintiff:
Connie Ann Raybourn
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Chris McBee, Todd Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBee v. Mueller et al
as 5:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Michael McBee
Defendant:
Steve Mueller, Cherokee County Detention Center, Maj Steven Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Harper v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, N.P.M. Davies, Joe Bugher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransom v. McBee
as 4:2023cv00922
Petitioner:
Monique Ransom
Respondent:
Chris McBee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halter v. McBee
as 4:2023cv01457
Petitioner:
Christina Halter
Respondent:
Chris McBee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBee v. Battle et al
as 4:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Lashelle McBee
Defendant:
Corwin Battle, John Rhone, Blake Eudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBee (PS) v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2023cv02907
Plaintiff:
Richard McBee and Unique Taylor
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Stephen Potts, Cynthia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currey v. Truitt et al
as 1:2023cv15443
Plaintiff:
Jacob M. Currey
Defendant:
Charles Truitt, D. Dixon, Anna McBee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Stuart et al
as 7:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Larry Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Dean Stuart, Eric Pluta, Michael Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. McBee
as 4:2023cv01010
Petitioner:
Monique L. Winston
Respondent:
Chris McBee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
