Cases 1 - 10 of 906
Meeks v. DeBouse
as 24-10431
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Meeks, III
Defendant:
Alvin DeBouse, FNU LNU, Chief Probation Officer, John Doe Task Force and others
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. ANONYMOUS HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Anonymous Health of Indiana, LLC, Jane Doe, R.N., John Doe, M.D. and others
SMITH v. COX et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant:
C. COX, M. SHEPPARD, J. MEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corie Yates v. Cpt. Degeare
as 24-6304
Plaintiff:
CORIE YATES
Defendant:
CPT. DEGEARE, Chief Classification/Monitor Records Branch, MAJOR SHABAZZ, Confinement Division, LT. QUESENBERRY, Classification/Evaluate Inmate Housing Status and others
ADAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TERRY T. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, STOOPY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Nelson
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Melvin LaMont Buck Meeks
Defendant:
LaQuesha LaShay Annette Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munson v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Steve Meeks, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cargile v. Meeks et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Shane Cargile
Defendant:
Isaac Meeks and Coffee County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canfield v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Canfield
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
