Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan Michael Spencer v. Michael Carvajal
as 2:2020cv03216
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal
Petitioner:
Ryan Michael Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ryan Michael Spencer v. J. Wyatt et al
as 2:2020cv01364
Defendant:
A. Cruickshank, Felipe Martinez, Jr., Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Michael Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Warden
as 3:2017cv00967
Petitioner:
Michael Spencer
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv08119
Petitioner:
Michael Spencer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Spencer #738161 v. Watkins et al
as 1:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Spencer #738161
Defendant:
Dewey S. Watkins, Unknown Martins, Unknown Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Wheeler v. Kim Ulisny, et al
as 11-3754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON CHRISTOPHER WHEELER
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM ULNSY, Mailroom Supervisor, SCI-Graterford, MICHAEL SPENCER, Business Manager, SCI-Graterford and US POSTAL SERVICE, Postmaster General (Collegeville)
Ronald Jackson v. Secretary PA Dept of Correctio, et al
as 11-1979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, DARINA VARNERI and others
MURPHY v. ULISNY et al
as 2:2011cv01062
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MURPHY, JR
Defendant:
KIM ULISNY, MICHAEL SPENCER, JOHN K. MURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv03636
Plaintiff:
RONALD JACKSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, DARINA VARNERI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
