Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Clark v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Clark
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clark v. Unknown Party
as 4:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Clark
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. Clark
as 22-30645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Stanley Clark, also known as cleverly concocted, also known as bossiercopssuck, also known as Barb Riley, also known as John Longson, also known as clarkbrothersla
Michael Stanley v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 22-2453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STANLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Clark v. Unknown Parties
as 4:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Clark
Respondent:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCollum v. Rochester Psychiatric Center et al
as 6:2022cv06057
Plaintiff:
Darius McCollum
Defendant:
Rochester Psychiatric Center, Jannette Wilson, Benita Zanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STANLEY v. TICE
as 3:2022cv00001
Petitioner:
MICHAEL STANLEY
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. USA
as 3:2019cv00145
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnston v. USA
as 6:2017cv00240
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Townsel v. Thomas et al
as 4:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Townsel
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
