Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jackson v. Morris et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Lieutenant, Mr. Daniels, Deputy, Mr. Morris, Mr. Toomer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funches v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches and Cecil Leshaun Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Neuse Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2023ct03353
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Porter
Defendant:
Neuse Correctional Institution and Mr. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2021cv04069
Plaintiff:
Ron Wesley Hayes
Defendant:
Ms. Connie Mitchell, Mr. Harris, Mr. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. Warden Breckon et al
as 7:2020cv00322
Defendant:
Officer Stapleton #1, Et, al. Six Unknowns, Captain Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Devon Melvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamlet v. Schultheiss et al
as 2:2018cv14342
Defendant:
Sgt. Coney, Officer Hoxie, Officer K. Schultheiss and others
Plaintiff:
Lynn Edward Hamlet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seelig v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2018ct03206
Defendant:
Ms. Hawkins, Ms. West, Mr. Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seelig v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2018ct03189
Defendant:
Mr. Stocks, Mr. Dawson, Mr. Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trillet v. Staton Correctional Facility (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00288
Plaintiff:
Billy W. Trillet
Defendant:
Staton Correctional Facility, Dr. Herring, Dr. Loveless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
