Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickens v. The State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Dickens, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, D.P.S.C.S. Secretary Robert Green, RCI Warden Carlos Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Canter v. The State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Amber Canter
Defendant:
The State Of Maryland, The D.P.S.C.S. Secretary Robert L. Green, Roxbury Correctional Institution Warden, Carlos Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. MARTOCCIA et al
as 1:2021cv02681
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN MARTOCCIA, K. NEWLIN and CRUZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Davis et al
as 0:2021cv02186
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Alexander Davis, Stephen Montry, Chris Newlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinegal v. Gibson et al
as 6:2021cv01849
Defendant:
Andrea Jones, Medical Staff Correct Health, K P Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Sinegal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Walz et al
as 0:2019cv02612
Defendant:
Bill Pal-Freeman, Michelle Smith, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2018cv00276
Defendant:
J. BRADLEY, J. E. KRUEGER, MCCOY and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWLIN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04394
Petitioner:
DONALD NEWLIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Priestley v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014fp00148
Defendant:
Michael Baker, Patrick Batchelder, Sr., Jonathan Duguay and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Priestley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
