Cases 1 - 10 of 1,202
Norwood v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Samuel Earl Norwood
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Norwood v. Vannoy
as 1:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Elmer Oscar Norwood
Respondent:
Wardner Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin v. Norwood et al
as 5:2024ct03089
Plaintiff:
Shurod Rankin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Norwood, Sergeant P. Fobbs and Major Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lavar Nelson
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Austin Calvert, Sidney Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Norwood et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Michael Fred Allen Lester
Defendant:
Sheriff David Norwood, Jail Administrator Cameron Owens, Shift Supervisor Amanda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Vannoy
as 5:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Elmer Oscar Norwood
Defendant:
Wardner Vannoy
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORWOOD v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00572
Petitioner:
QUARTEZ NORWOOD
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv16342
Petitioner:
Khalid Norwood
Respondent:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Khalid Norwood
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Norwood
as 0:2023cv62068
Plaintiff:
Terrance Dagrin Vaughn
Defendant:
Kari Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
