Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cochran et al v. Labat et al
as 1:2023cv03773
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Sheriff Patrick Labat, Officer Reid Thornton, Officer K. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DAM v. MAINE STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH W VAN DAM
Defendant:
MAINE STATE PRISON and OFFICER REID
Interested Party:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heyward-Jones v. Reid et al
as 4:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Officer Reid, Sheriff John Wilcher and Chatham County Sheriff Office
Plaintiff:
Kavon Heyward-Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Harry et al
as 3:2019cv00234
Plaintiff:
Obrian Lewis
Defendant:
Lieutenant L. Dereese, Corrections Officer Reid, Corrections Officer Britton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Page et al
as 5:2018ct03249
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Erik A. Hooks, Paula Page and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hooks et al
as 5:2018ct03208
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Boyles, Mr. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06653
Defendant:
Police Officer Reid Astrida, P. Barnes, Mayor Bill Blasio and others
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnie Steverson v. Benjie Nobles, et al
as 15-12139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNIE STEVERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BENJIE NOBLES, RICHARD WYCHE, T. EDWARDS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
