Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Porter v. King et al
as 6:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
M King, VerPloeg, M Tizen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olsson v. Malis et al
as 1:2022cv06575
Plaintiff:
Paul Olsson
Defendant:
Richard Malis, Jeff Pharris, Daniel Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHARRIS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv01197
Petitioner:
GLEN A. PHARRIS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Hardy et al
as 1:2020cv03285
Plaintiff:
Rachel Stevens
Defendant:
Tahseen Mohammed, Jeff Pharris, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Zubik et al
as 1:2020cv01701
Plaintiff:
Jon Johnson and Paul Olsson
Defendant:
Coleen Delaney, Jeff Pharris, Jeff Pilario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olsson v. Dyslin et al
as 1:2020cv00578
Defendant:
Tahseen Mohammed, Unknown OIG employees, The Office of the Inspector General and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Olsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nadzhafaliyev v. Dyslin et al
as 1:2019cv02590
Defendant:
Jeff Pharris, Daniel Dyslin, Richard Malis and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Nadzhafaliyev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felton Matthews, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-15712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELTON L. MATTHEWS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Matthews v. USA et al
as 3:2017cv00050
Defendant:
E. Anderson, Renee Baker, Mrs. Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Arbuckle et al
as 5:2015cv01965
Plaintiff:
Roy R Jones
Defendant:
Rodney Arbuckle, Rick Pharris, Robert E Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
