Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Smith #347733 v. Knipe et al
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Bernard A. Smith #347733
Defendant:
Andrea Knipe, Alyssa Mast, Brenda Buchannan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payment v. Pugh et al
as 3:2022cv05569
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Payment
Defendant:
Ryan Pugh and Eric Wulf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. Akiri et al
as 4:2021cv03596
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
Kenneth Akiri, Campu Solution X IT Company, Diamond Dialysis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans #367619 v. Horton et al
as 2:2020cv00134
Defendant:
Unknown Bigger, Unknown Trestrail, Unknown Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
Alrelio Evans #367619
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill #724440 v. Buchanan et al
as 2:2019cv00048
Defendant:
J. Corrigan, John Burke, Terry Moron and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Durell Hill #724440
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payment v. Brewer et al
as 4:2018cv05125
Defendant:
Sergio Rocha, James Powell, Daniel Stoddard and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Payment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2018cv02240
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Reed
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Mike Rallings, J. Perea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00871
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams, Williams, Scott & Associates LLC, WSA, LLC and others
Defendant:
United States of America, FTC, Robin Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Aiken Public Safety et al
as 1:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
James Muhammad
Defendant:
Aiken Public Safety, Aiken Sheriff's Dept., Aiken Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford #158819 v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
George Ford #158819
Defendant:
Unknown Smith, Jeffrey Woods, Unknown Isard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
